From
StayCurrentMD
A Modification of the Anoplasty Technique during a Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty and Anorectal Vaginal Urethroplasty Closure: The Para-U-Stitch to Prevent Wound Dehiscence
dx.doi.org shows its articles on its own site.
Read the article on dx.doi.org ↗Article · Mar 2023 · 1 min read
In brief
In brief
This retrospective study of 232 patients describes a novel para-U-stitch anoplasty technique designed to reduce wound dehiscence following posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for anorectal malformations. The modified approach achieved a 1.7% dehiscence rate requiring operative intervention, with lower rates in PSARP versus PSARVUP procedures.
- Para-U-stitch anoplasty technique achieved 1.7% wound dehiscence rate in 232 ARM repairs, significantly lower than historical rates.
- Technique buttresses midline U-stitch and everts rectal mucosa along anterior/posterior anoplasty margins during PSARP/PSARVUP.
- Dehiscence rates were lower in PSARP vs PSARVUP (0.6% vs 5.2%) and in patients without diverting stoma (1.2% vs 2.0%).
- Rectoperineal fistula was most common ARM subtype (28.9%); 75% underwent PSARP, 25% PSARVUP, with 63.4% having protective stoma.
- Only 2.6% developed superficial wound infections managed conservatively, demonstrating overall low morbidity with standardized protocols.
Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.
Objective Wound dehiscence after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) or anorectal vaginal urethroplasty (PSARVUP) for anorectal malformation (ARM) is a morbid complication. We present a novel anoplasty technique employing para-U-stitches along the anterior and posterior portions of the anoplasty, which helps buttress the midline U-stitch and evert the rectal mucosa. We hypothesized that, in addition to standardized pre- and postoperative protocols, this technique would lower rates of wound dehiscence. Materials and Methods A retrospective review of patievnts who underwent primary PSARP or PSARVUP with the para-U-stitch technique from 2015 to 2021 was performed. Wound dehiscence was defined as wound disruption requiring operative intervention within 30 days of the index operation. Superficial wound separations were excluded. Descriptive statistics were calculated. The final cohort included 232 patients. Results Rectoperineal fistula (28.9%) was the most common ARM subtype. PSARP was performed in 75% and PSARVUP in 25%. The majority were reconstructed with a stoma in place (63.4%). Wound dehiscence requiring operative intervention occurred in four patients, for an overall dehiscence rate of 1.7%. The dehiscence rate was lower in PSARPs compared with PSARVUPs (0.6 vs. 5.2%) and lower for reconstruction without a stoma compared with a stoma (1.2 vs. 2.0%). There were additional six patients (2.6%) with superficial wound infections managed conservatively. Conclusion We present the para-U-stitch anoplasty technique, which is an adjunct to the standard anoplasty during PSARP and PSARVUP. In conjunction with standardized pre- and postoperative protocols, this technique can help decrease rates of wound dehiscence in this patient population.
Educational content from recorded physician discussions — not medical advice. Talk to your (or your child's) care team about your situation.
Article
The disproportionate burden of severe obesity in youth with special needs and the role of metabolic and bariatric surgery
Published Jun 2026
Video
Pediatric Surgical Oncology Research Collaborative (PSORC): Studying Rare Pediatric Tumors
56 s · Published May 2026
Video
Update Course Rewind 2025: Hirschsprung + ARM: Rare but Real
1 min · Published May 2026
Video
Pooling Patients to Study Rare Pediatric Tumors: An Introduction to PSORC
56 s · Published May 2026
Article
Type of pledget and suture technique relative to esophageal tensile strength in long-gap esophageal atresia
Published May 2026
Video
The fetal frontier: A review of current and emerging fetal therapies for genetic diseases
44 s · Published May 2026