From
StayCurrentMD
The Diagnostics and Management of Bronchopulmonary Sequestration: An International Survey among Specialized Caregivers
dx.doi.org shows its articles on its own site.
Read the article on dx.doi.org ↗Article · Mar 2024 · 1 min read
In brief
In brief
International survey of 63 specialized caregivers across 17 countries reveals significant variation in bronchopulmonary sequestration management approaches, with surgical resection preferred over embolization in both symptomatic (62% vs 15%) and asymptomatic cases (38% vs 9%). Treatment preferences differ significantly between surgeons and nonsurgeons, highlighting the need for standardized multidisciplinary protocols.
- Most specialized centers (62%) prefer surgical resection over embolization for symptomatic bronchopulmonary sequestration cases.
- Treatment approach varies significantly: 52% base decisions on symptom presence, 32% on lesion location (intralobar vs extralobar).
- In asymptomatic BPS, practice is divided: 38% favor resection, 32% prefer observation, only 9% choose embolization.
- Multidisciplinary team discussion is standard in only 52% of centers treating BPS, suggesting room for care standardization.
- Treatment preferences differ significantly between pediatric surgeons and nonsurgeons, highlighting specialty-specific practice patterns.
Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.
Background Our objective was to explore the treatment preferences for bronchopulmonary sequestration (BPS) among an international group of specialized caregivers. Methods Sixty-three participants from 17 countries completed an online survey concerning the diagnostics, treatment, and follow-up. Recruitment took place among members of the Collaborative Neonatal Network for the first European Congenital Pulmonary Airway Malformation Trial Consortium and through the Association for European Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology working group database. Results Most of the 63 participants were pediatric surgeons (52%), followed by pediatric pulmonologists (22%), and pediatric cardiologists (19%). The majority (65%) treated more than five cases per year and 52% standardly discussed treatment in a multidisciplinary team. Half of the participants (52%) based the management on the presence of symptoms, versus 32% on the intralobar or extralobar lesion localization. Centers with both surgical and interventional cardiac/radiological facilities (85%) preferred resection to embolization in symptomatic cases (62 vs. 15%). In asymptomatic cases too, resection was preferred over embolization (38 vs. 9%); 32% preferred noninterventional treatment, while 11% varied in preference. These treatment preferences were significantly different between surgeons and nonsurgeons (p
Educational content from recorded physician discussions — not medical advice. Talk to your (or your child's) care team about your situation.
Article
The disproportionate burden of severe obesity in youth with special needs and the role of metabolic and bariatric surgery
Published Jun 2026
Video
Pediatric Surgical Oncology Research Collaborative (PSORC): Studying Rare Pediatric Tumors
56 s · Published May 2026
Video
Update Course Rewind 2025: Hirschsprung + ARM: Rare but Real
1 min · Published May 2026
Video
Pooling Patients to Study Rare Pediatric Tumors: An Introduction to PSORC
56 s · Published May 2026
Article
Type of pledget and suture technique relative to esophageal tensile strength in long-gap esophageal atresia
Published May 2026
Video
The fetal frontier: A review of current and emerging fetal therapies for genetic diseases
44 s · Published May 2026