StayCurrentMD · Infographic: Practice Patterns and Outcomes of Hemodialysis in Infants Undergoing Congenital Heart Surgery in the United States
Infographic1 min read·Published May 2026

Infographic: Practice Patterns and Outcomes of Hemodialysis in Infants Undergoing Congenital Heart Surgery in the United States

Infographic showing three surgical approaches for pediatric achalasia with success rates and outcomes

Infographic · May 2026 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Multi-institutional study of 332 infants requiring hemodialysis after congenital heart surgery shows 46% one-year survival vs 94% in non-dialysis patients. High-volume dialysis centers achieved triple the hospital survival compared to low-volume centers, suggesting center experience significantly impacts outcomes in this high-risk population.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the infographic.

A three-column comparison layout with medical illustrations of esophageal procedures. Each column contains anatomical diagrams in blue and pink tones showing the esophagus and stomach, with accompanying text blocks below describing outcomes. The left column shows balloon dilation, the middle shows Heller myotomy, and the right shows POEM procedure. Success rate percentages are prominently displayed for each approach.

Grant Chappell, Darren Turner, Amir Mehdizadeh-Shrifi, David Lehenbauer, Marco Ricci, Meghan M Chlebowski, Stuart L Goldstein, Awais Ashfaq, David L S Morales

Abstract
Hemodialysis after infant congenital heart surgery (CHS) for acute kidney injury (AKI) presents a major challenge due to relatively low utilization, difficult vascular access and small patient size. Therefore, we performed a multi-institutional analysis for infants requiring hemodialysis post-CHS. The Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) was queried for infants undergoing CHS from 2004 to 2024. Intermittent hemodialysis (iHD) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) were included, patients undergoing pre-CHS dialysis or post-CHS peritoneal dialysis during admission were excluded. High HD use centers were in the top 10% of HD usage while low HD use centers were all other centers. After CHS, 1% (332/31,634) of infants received a form of hemodialysis (HD); 61% (204/332) received CRRT, 11% (37/332) received iHD, 11% (36/332) received both, and 17% (55/332) had an unknown type. HD was provided in 2% (220/12,898) of neonates (< 31days-old at CHS) vs. 1% (112/18,736) of infants 31-365 days old (p < 0.001). One-year survival was lower in the dialysis vs. non-dialysis cohort (46% vs. 94%, p < 0.0001). CRRT patients had higher one-year survival vs. iHD (50% vs. 25%, weighted log-rank; p = 0.01), although there was no difference after adjustment upon multivariate analysis. HD infants at high HD use centers had improved hospital and 1-year survival vs. low HD use (66% vs. 23%; 67% vs. 28%, p < 0.0001). Infants requiring hemodialysis (iHD or CRRT) post-CHS suffer from poor outcomes with < 50% 1-year survival, with high HD use centers having triple the hospital survival and double the 1-year survival, suggesting modifiable factors may mitigate poor outcomes.
The text in the image

Pediatric Achalasia: Comparing Surgical Approaches | Esophageal Dilatation | 45% Success Rate | Heller Myotomy | 78% Success Rate | POEM (Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy) | 99% Success Rate | Systematic review of 742 cases | Highest efficacy but requires specialized training | Higher complication rates | Most accessible procedure | Lower initial success | Established technique | Moderate success | Minimally invasive | Excellent outcomes | Requires advanced endoscopic skills

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this infographic · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →