Amr Moursi · The IMRaD-Reverse Writing Method
Video4 min·Published Jun 2026

The IMRaD-Reverse Writing Method

With Dr. Amr Moursi

Chapter 1 of 4 · Evidence & Research

Traditional approach problems

The Problem with Traditional Top-Down Writing

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this video · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →

More from this expert

Dr. Amr Moursi
What the experts said10 expert statements · 2 host summaries
The introduction section asks writers to position findings against literature gaps before those findings are written, making it difficult to write first.
Opinion
Projects stall not due to lack of data or willpower, but due to the order of writing actions.
Opinion
Writing sections in the order the research provides them (close to reverse order) removes friction and maintains momentum through submission.
Opinion
The methodology section should be written while collecting data because the choice of study design (retrospective, prospective, cross-sectional) is made when collection begins.
Opinion
The methods section is the easiest section because it simply records what was done.
Opinion
The results section should present findings without interpretation, building tables and key numbers first, then writing descriptive sentences.
Opinion
Literature gathered during initial project validation should be saved to form the main body of the discussion section.
Opinion
The introduction is easier to write when the story's ending is already known.
Opinion
The abstract should be written last, following the word count and structure of the target journal.
Opinion
The reverse-build writing order is: methods, results, discussion, introduction, abstract.
Opinion
Most researchers are taught to write papers from the top down: title, introduction, methods.
Host summaryThe host summarizing a resource · not cited in answers
Good projects often disappear during the writing phase, not at the idea or data stage.
Host summaryThe host summarizing a resource · not cited in answers